EN 中文
☰
Countries
Topics
Brands
News
Search

China

Supreme People's Court publishes research report on cross-border gambling governance

China's Supreme People's Court published a research report on cross-border gambling governance, reporting a large rise in such cases since 2021 and flagging unclear sentencing standards.

News

Home › News › Supreme People's Court publishes research report on cross-border gambling governance

China's Supreme People's Court published a research report on cross-border gambling governance on 18 August 2023, written by its Fifth Criminal Division, which reported a large increase in cross-border gambling crime since 2021 and set out plans for coordination, guidance and rule-making1.

The report said the division carried out a special study of cross-border gambling governance, gathering information and views from various parties1. It found that cross-border gambling crime has diversified, with gambling groups moving operations from physical casinos to hidden online operations and using blockchain, encrypted communications and virtual currency to evade enforcement1. Online gambling, it said, has low operating costs, servers located overseas, convenient fund settlement and relative ease of evading crackdowns1.

On case numbers, the report stated:

"2021年以来跨境赌博犯罪案件数增长幅度大,2022年虽有所回落,但预计2023年还将保持高位态势"
Supreme People's Court, Fifth Criminal Division1

The report said online cross-border casino operations are frequent, with many major cases, high sums involved and large social impact1. It described a long criminal chain whose technical support, payment settlement and promotion links have spawned upstream and downstream industries including help with information network crime, infringement of citizens' personal information, underground banking and money laundering through "running points"1.

The report listed four areas of difficulty: enforcement, case adjudication, coordination and application of law1. Cross-border factors, it said, cause problems in filing cases, obtaining evidence and freezing and seizing funds, and payment services combining banks and third-party payment methods add to the difficulty1. It said the boundary between the crime of organizing participation in gambling outside China and the crime of running a casino is unclear, and that the thresholds for "huge amount" and "serious circumstances" for the organizing offense are not clear1. That offense, Article 303(3) of the Criminal Law, does not set a penalty directly but refers to the preceding paragraph, making it a referential provision1.

What it means for players

The report is a statement of the court system's own difficulties rather than a new rule, so nothing in it changes what is legal or illegal for players in China. It confirms that authorities treat cross-border gambling, including online play through overseas servers, as a continuing enforcement priority, and that cases against organizers and participants are expected to stay at a high level in 20231. The report notes that the offense of organizing participation in gambling outside China carries no separate penalty scale of its own and that key sentencing thresholds are unclear, which means outcomes for defendants in such cases have not been settled by this document1. For Chinese citizens who gamble on cross-border sites, the report offers no new guidance on individual liability. The wider legal position is set out in the site's guide to gambling laws in Asia and to whether you can gamble in China.

What happens next

The report set out six work plans1:

  • Strengthening communication and coordination with relevant departments and analyzing possible problems in advance1
  • Issuing documents with relevant departments at an appropriate time to build consensus on how cross-border gambling offenses are characterized and how sentences are balanced1
  • Improving contact mechanisms between courts at all levels and strengthening trial guidance in major cases1
  • Building a multi-party research and assessment platform to provide early warning information1
  • Feeding social governance problems found in trials back to departments through judicial suggestions1
  • Expanding legal publicity through public trials and typical cases1

No dates were given for any of these steps1.

Sources1 sources
  1. 主题教育调研成果巡礼|关于跨境赌博治理问题调研报告 - 中华人民共和国最高人民法院, court.gov.cn